The second is a story of two people who were given a
CAFR
at the end of a tour of a new government building. The first
person looked at it, was overwhelmed with its detail, and threw
it away. The second person simply thought she would be
different and tried to find out more about this CAFR. One
evening, she just happened to find a cable station carrying a
meeting of the government that distributed the CAFR. Although
she only watched for a short time she found out that the
building she toured was being leased by the government and that
the government was obligated to pay the lease for ten years.
Someone at the meeting made reference to the fact that it was
all in the CAFR. She then paged through the CAFR and after some
searching found a section on leases. The amount seems pretty
high to her based on her experience with office leases. The
next time she voted she used this information in deciding how to
vote, although it was not the major factor. She thought that
even a little information from a complex document can be helpful
because there are many other complementary sources of
information in one's daily life. She even complained to friend
at work about how difficult it is to understand government
financial reports
. Her friend said rhetorically, do they really want you to
understand what's going on in government? She thought about
that statement but couldn't decide one way or the other since
she did get some benefit from her effort. So she had some faith
but she was skeptical too.
For both people the CAFR was originally a cacophony of
sounds. But for the person who even took a passing interest
some but certainly not all the sounds made sense. In fact
cacophony is a good way to describe a CAFR for a first time
viewer. All those numbers and words jump out without much
if any meaning.