Alternative Reporting Models: Compliance and Liquidity v. Accrual and Consolidation

Stories relating to chapter II of Financial Reporting in Government
By Dr. John Sacco , George Mason University
Revised Saturday, April 12, 1997

A father was very concerned that his son follow the rules in school. Dad's affection and allowance often varied directly with how well the son followed the rules. One instance is particularly instructive of how following the rules can lead to missing the big picture. Freshmen were encouraged to get in the habit of riding the bus to school, but this boy had the opportunity to catch a ride from one of the neighbors who drove to school. Which choice was "cool" and which not is obvious. It turned out that the neighbor also liked art and would often drive to the local museum on weekends. But, a friendship never flourished because the freshmen followed the rules and took the bus. Governments sometimes specify exactly how to spend budget dollars to reduce poor judgment or favoritism, but in specifying exactly what to do opportunities or the big picture can be lost.
A single parent wanted to make sure her son didn't miss out on having things that other child in neighborhood had. Skates, bikes, and the latest fashions were among the things. Of course, the son began to expect these things. Since the mom had a good job at first, no problem. Later she had to borrow, but promotions and bonuses always came to pay the bills. Unfortunately, when a down turn came in the economy, Mom continued to use the credit card but the promotions and bonus lagged. The ending was unhappy for everyone. Having a system where you can make promises without the necessary savings can spell disaster.
A government would like to continue doing its regular road repair but is short on revenues. Someone suggests that the repairs can last longer than a year thus warranting borrowing for the repairs. The government follows the suggestion and borrows on terms that do not require the government to pay back the principal until two years later. The legislator requires that all the repair work and related borrowing go into a particular fund called a capital project fund. Since the borrowing is equal to the cost of the repairs, this fund looks to be performing fine. However, since the government is short on revenues it does not save any money during the current year to pay off the debt incurred by borrowing for the repairs. It backs the debt with the full faith and credit of government assuming that revenues will bounce back later. Revenues do not bounce back and the government finds itself in trouble.
A government would like to built an add-on to one of its buildings to provide daycare, but would have to borrow to do so. Someone suggests setting up a fund to do the borrowing and the building but also says that an other fund must be established to save each year to pay off the debt. No one can agree on extra taxes or where to cut to do the savings and the daycare facility is dropped. The financial statements look fine because of the prudence but a good project is lost.
See Also: homework , project elements , course readings , the glossary , exercies and demonstrations , and a summary